Commonwealth v. Arizini
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a jury of driving under the influence of liquor. Act of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, § 1037, 75 P.S. § 1037, repealed by the Act of June 17, 1976, P.L. 162, No. 81, § 7 (effective July 1, 1977). 1 On appeal the principal issue is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
At trial the Commonwealth produced five witnesses. Their testimony may be summarized as follows.
On December 31, 1976, appellant and Bill Hawley went to Bruce Cassidy’s home between 9:00 and 10:00 p. m. After some discussion, Cassidy, Hawley, appellant, and Mark Lucas…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KlochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- State v. WinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. SpeightsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. CieriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. GamberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.