Legal Opinion
Municipality of Anchorage v. Serrano
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided August 6, 1982No. 6447, 6724 and 6725PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
Petitioners Kay Cisneros, et al., were arrested for driving while intoxicated under AS 28.35.030. 1 Pursuant to Alaska’s implied consent law, AS 28.35.031, 2 each submitted to a breathalyzer test. Respondents Gilbert Serrano, et al., were arrested for driving while intoxicated under AMC 9.28.-020. 3 Pursuant to Anchorage’s implied consent ordinance, AMC 9.28.021, 4 they too submitted to breathalyzer tests. In each case, the test result was 0.10 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.
The cases were consolidated before District Court Judge Cutler. A motion was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Garcia v. Dist. Court, 21st Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. NealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Thorne v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Briggs v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.