Legal Opinion
Lauderdale v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1976No. 2761PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and CON-NOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ., and DIMOND, J. Pro Tern. DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem.
Lloyd Lauderdale has been charged with the offense of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. He submitted to a breathalyzer test in accordance with AS 28.35.031. 1 After entering a not guilty plea, Lauderdale filed a motion for discovery and inspection of the ampoule used in the breathalyzer test. The ampoule was not produced by the state. The district court ordered the results of the breathalyzer test suppressed, and upon review by the superior court, the order of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DennisonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.