Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Robbins

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1915No. Crim. No. 313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made in the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The petitioner was convicted in the justice’s court of Red Bluff Township, Tehama County, of violating section 626f of the Penal Code, a misdemeanor, and was thereupon sentenced to pay a fine of $150.00 or he imprisoned in the county jail of said county “until said fine is paid, not exceeding 150 days.” Having failed to pay the fine he was committed to the county jail.

He now insists that the judgment of sentence is null and void, that the commitment upon which the sheriff detains him is of necessity likewise affected and that consequently he is illegally restrained of his liberty.

The section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Farnham v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ex Parte BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. American Type Founders Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ex Parte RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. SourisseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. In Re CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. In Re ElsholzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. MagoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API