Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Baldwin

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1882No. 10,733PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application for release on habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

In this case the petitioner, A. J. Baldwin, applies to be released from imprisonment on a writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner was convicted of a misdemeanor, punishable by fine only. Judgment was entered against him, as appears in the commitment, as follows:

“In the Justices’ Court of Branciforte Township, in the County of Santa Cruz, State of California. The people of the State of California:
“To the Sheriff of the County, of Santa Cruz, greeting:
“Whereas, A. J. Baldwin has, on the twenty-third day of December, 1881, been convicted before ine, L. Curtis, a Justice of the Peace of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex parte KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Ex parte EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex parte MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In Re BouchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Carmody v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. In Re KennerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Matter of Application of RobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API