People v. Magoni
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
By separate counts in the information the defendant was charged with two unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor, alleged to have been made on different days. She was convicted on both counts. Her motion for a new trial was denied. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction.
One witness testified in detail that the defendant made the sales as alleged. The liquor described in the first count contained ten per cent of alcohol by volume and that in the second count forty-seven per cent. The defendant testified that she did not make either sale. Under such state of the evidence the implied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- People v. OppenheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex parte Chin YanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- In Re KennerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. GippleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- People v. DjekichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.