In Re 24R, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this employment discrimination case, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to compel arbitration pursuant to a written arbitration agreement signed by the employer and an at-will employee. Because the arbitration agreement is not illusory, we hold that the trial court erred by refusing to compel arbitration. For the reasons expressed below, we conditionally grant mandamus relief and direct the trial court to vacate its order denying the motion to compel.
Frances Cabrera worked for 24R, Inc., d/b/a “The Boot Jack,” as an at-will employee for approximately…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Bob Montgomery Chevrolet, Inc. v. Dent Zone Companies, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind v. Container Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.