Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" Lopez
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
This interlocutory appeal involves the enforceability of an arbitration provision in an attorney-client employment contract. The provision specifies that the client and firm will arbitrate disputes that arise between them, except for claims made by firm for recovery of its fees and expenses. After the underlying matter was settled, the client sued the firm. The trial court denied the firm’s motion to order the dispute to arbitration. On interlocutory appeal, the court of appeals affirmed on the basis that the arbitration provision is substantively unconscionable and unenforceable.
We conclude…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- First Bank v. BrumittTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- ConocoPhillips Co. v. KoopmannTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, A/S/O Mirsan, L.P., D/B/A Sienna Ridge Apartments v. Carmen A. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Ivan Arnold v. HomeAway, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Kimberly Huckaba v. Ref-Chem, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.