Legal Opinion

Wallin v. Letourneau

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1994No. C2-94-1046PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s determination that they failed to provide respondents with sufficient notice of their claim under Minn.Stat. § 340A.802 (1990), the dram shop act. Because respondents received actual notice of appellants’ claim, we reverse.

FACTS

On February 21, 1992, appellant Arlene Wallin collided with a vehicle driven by Scott Letourneau. She and her son, Michael Wal-lin, were injured. Prior to the accident, Le-tourneau consumed alcohol at The Hitching Post Bar and Restaurant, an establishment owned and operated by Leaders’ Enterprises, Inc.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Wegan v. Village of LexingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Hirth v. Village of Long PrairieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Kelly v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallin v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API