Legal Opinion

Kelly v. City of Rochester

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1975No. 44518PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

These actions were brought by Paul F. Kelly, individually, and on behalf of his son, Brian, to recover damages for injuries sustained by Brian in a diving accident at a pool owned and operated by the city of Rochester. In each case, the trial court granted the defendant city’s motion for summary judgment because of plaintiff’s failure to comply with the provisions of Minn. St. 1971, § 466.05, subd. 1, requiring notice of claims against municipalities,- to be given within 30 days of the accident from which the claim arises. We reverse.

Of the several issues raised by plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hirth v. Village of Long PrairieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Lyons v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Doyle v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Seifert v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kossak v. StallingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. McCaleb v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Besette v. Enderlin School District No. 22North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API