Legal Opinion
Wegan v. Village of Lexington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 1981No. 51922, 51619, 51718, 51468 and 52074PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This matter involves four actions which, for purposes of this appeal, have been con*275solidated. In three of the cases, Wegan v. Village of Lexington, Rounsville v. Leons, Inc., and Wolfe v. Chinook, Inc., plaintiffs-appellants brought suit pursuant to the Minnesota Dram Shop Act, Minn.Stat. § 340.95 (1980), for recovery of damages they suffered in accidents allegedly caused by the illegal sale of liquor to defendant drivers. In the fourth action, Ecker v. Arcade Bar, Inc., the plaintiff-appellant alleged, inter alia, violations of the Minnesota Dram Shop Act and negligence in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Trail v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.