Legal Opinion

Gunther v. White

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1973PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUMPHREYS, Justice.

Appellants sued, asking that appellees be restrained from enforcing an acceleration provision in a trust deed. The Chancellor dismissed the suit on appellees’ motion, pursuant to Rule 12.02 of RCP, that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Appellants have appealed assigning errors which raise the question whether an acceleration clause such as that in the deed of trust is valid and enforceable in Tennessee. We agree with the Chancellor that the acceleration clause is valid.

Appellants own certain real estate encumbered by a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Bacon v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Olcott v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Baker v. Loves Park Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API