Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 28, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKtr-by, J.

This appeal challenges the validity of act 146 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1927, as not having been passed by the requisite majority of the Legislature, and the authority of the State Debt Board to issue the notes or bonds, because no specific appropriation of the money to be raised by the bond issue was made therein authorizing its use or expenditure.

Appellant, a taxpayer of Jefferson County, brought suit in the Pulaski Chancery Court for an injunction against the State Debt Board to prevent the issuance and sale of the notes or bonds provided for in said act. It was alleged that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Dickinson v. ClibournSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Stratton v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Jobe v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Grable v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. State Game & Fish Commission v. HornadaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Humphrey v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API