Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1951No. 4-9264PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grieein Smith, Chief Justice."

Act 166' approved February 25, 1949, appropriates $50,000 for each year of the biennium ending- June 30, 1951. The purpose expressed in Sec. 1 is to support and assist colleges of the state having at the time the Act was passed a senior class in pharmaceutical education. Section 2 authorizes the State Board of Pharmacy to spend the appropriation as made in Sec. 1 and invests the Board with full power “to use its discretion in the manner in which said funds shall he disbursed so long as the intention of the Act is carried out.”

F. B. Garrett, a taxpaying citizen,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Belote v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Hudson v. HigginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rockefeller v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Turner v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Fisher v. PerroniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Fisher v. PerroniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API