Legal Opinion
Stratton v. Green
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1872No. 3,568PublishedCited by 30 opinions
Application for a writ of mandamus to require the Controller of State to draw Ms warrant in payment of the salary of the petitioner as a member of the Board of Tide Land Commissioners. The facts are stated in the opinion. Uaymond, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to be lirected to the Controller of State upon the following facts igreed by the parties:
“ I. That the petitioner now is, and since the 1st day of february, 1872, has been a member of the Board of Tide -land Commissioners, duly appointed,, qualified, and acting ssuch.
“ II. That the respondent now is, and since the 10th day *150of January, 1872, has been Controller of State, duly elected, qualified, and acting as such.
“ III. That the salary of each member of the Board of Tide Land Commissioners is two thousand five hundred dollars per…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Edwards v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- State ex rel. Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Hunt v. CallaghanArizona Supreme Court · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.