Legal Opinion

State Game & Fish Commission v. Hornaday

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1951No. 4-9487PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

The Game and Fish Commission brought an action in Calhoun Circuit Court to condemn certain lands for use in conservation and propagation of fish. K. G. Hornaday and his wife, Catherine, as owners of some of the land needed for the project, defended on the ground that the primary purpose was not conservation or any of the kindred matters enumerated in Amendment No. 35 to the Constitution. They contended interested persons had purchased a large part of the adjacent lands and planned to organize a private corporation for the purpose of enjoying benefits of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ClibournSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. W. R. Wrape Stave Co. v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Grable v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Hampton v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Scougale v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Gray v. Ouachita Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Burford v. UptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Magruder v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API