Legal Opinion

Kings, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This suit'was brought to recover on a bond, of the schedule type, indemnifying the complainant employer against loss by defalcation, etc., of a listed employee. A demurrer was overruled by the Chancellor and defendant has appealed. The determinative question is one of construction of the contract of indemnity, specifically of the application to be given the word “bond” as it appears in certain context.

Provision is made for adding new employees to the schedule, and for striking out and cancelling coverage of any one or more, from time to time, and determination of liability accordingly. An…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Co-Operative Stores Co. v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Royal Ins. Co. v. Vanderbilt Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Traders' Insurance v. DobbinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Cambria Coal Co. v. National Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hoffman v. Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API