Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Insurance Companies

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. B. M. Estes, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtLuRTON, J.

Sellers Hoffman obtained fire insurance from each of defendant companies upon his cotton-mills, machinery, and stock, situated in Kelleyville, Penn. A loss by fire has occurred, *737and he brings these several suits to recover from each of defendants a proportion of the loss.

The property covered is described in an exhibit attached to each policy, and consists of twenty-one separate and distinct parcels, having extended opposite each item, in figures, a sum, presumably the estimated valuation of each item. The aggregate of these several values is $90,000. The total loss by fire is admitted to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hand v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Interstate Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. GammonsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  2. State ex rel. Rogers v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Traders' Insurance v. DobbinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Palatine Insurance v. E. K. Hardison Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. Kings, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API