Legal Opinion

Traders' Insurance v. Dobbins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM MAURY. Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Maury County.— Sam Holding, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The Traders’ Insurance Company had a general form of policy, which, among other provisions, contained the following: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed herein or added hereto, shall be void ... if (any usage or custom of trade to the contrary notwithstanding) there be kept, used or allowed, on the above-described premises, benzine, ben-zole, dynamite, ether, fireworks, gasoline, greek-fire, gunpowder, exceeding twenty-five pounds in quantity, naptha, nitroglycerine, or other explosives, phosphorous or petroleum, or any of its products of greater…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Kratzenstein v. Western Assurance Co. of TorontoNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Dilleber v. . Home Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Herrman v. . Merchants' Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Morningstar v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Conley v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Kavanaugh v. Security Trust & Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hunter v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Indiana Reduction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API