Legal Opinion

Royal Ins. Co. v. Vanderbilt Ins. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. Jno. L. T. Sneed, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

This is a suit on a policy of insurance. The complainant company carrying a risk on cotton in a compress at Greenville, Texas, secured from the defendant a policy of insurance by which it undertook to underwrite the complainant to the extent of one-half its risk. The cotton covered by the original policy was destroyed by fire on November 14, 1887, and proofs of loss were immediately furnished to the Royal Insurance Company, which company also notified the Vanderbilt Insurance Company. Controversy as to liability having arisen, litigation between the assured and the Royal Insurance Company…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Jackson v. . St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Faneuil Hall Insurance v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Neff v. Cherokee Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Friend Bros. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Ruohs v. Traders Fire InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Co-Operative Stores Co. v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API