Legal Opinion
Kallas v. Harnen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 31, 1998No. AC 16720PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Charles Hamen, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Michael A. Kallas, in accordance with the report of an attorney trial referee.1 On appeal to this court, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly accepted the referee’s report,2 which concluded that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff for returning the plaintiffs earnest money deposit on a condominium unit. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
There is little dispute as to the basic facts. In March, 1986, the defendant entered into a contract to sell…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Beizer v. GoepfertConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Meadows v. HigginsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Villano v. PolimeniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Gould v. HallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.