Legal Opinion
Meadows v. Higgins
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 30, 1998No. AC 17533PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendants, Harrison Higgins and Linda Higgins,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Meadows, doing business as Paper Pro, as to the complaint and as to the defendants’ counterclaim. On appeal, the *288defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) determined that the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-418 et seq., does not apply to the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants and (2) awarded attorney’s fees to the plaintiff pursuant to General Statutes § 52-249, which provides for such fees in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRiccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Original Grasso Construction Co. v. ShepherdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Kronberg Bros. v. SteeleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.