Legal Opinion
Young v. Young
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 13, 1999No. SC 16000PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
In this certified appeal, arising out of a summary process eviction action, we must resolve two issues. First, we must determine whether the defendants’ motion to reargue tolled the statutory appeal period for summary process actions, under General *484Statutes § 47a-35,1 until the trial court’s denial of that motion. We conclude that it did. Second, we must determine whether the defendants’ failure to post a surety bond within five days of the entry of judgment, pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-35a,2 provided a proper basis for dismissal of the defendants’ appeal. We conclude…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Mayron's Bake Shops, Inc. v. Arrow Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- City of Bristol v. Ocean State Job Lot Stores of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. RogelstadConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Waterbury Twin, LLC v. Renal Treatment Centers-Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Sproviero v. J.M. Scott Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.