Legal Opinion

Neyens v. Sellnow

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1962No. Civ. 19686PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the wife and property and other damage suffered by the husband, as a result of an automobile collision in which the wife was involved. The jury returned a verdict in defendant’s favor. This appeal is from “the verdict, judgment, and denial of plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. . . .” An appeal does not lie from a verdict (Robins v. Weis (1950) 97 Cal.App.2d 144, 145 [217 P.2d 156]) nor from an order denying a motion for a new trial in a civil case. (Rodriguez v. Barnett (1959) 52 Cal.2d 154,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Freitas v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Pandell v. HischierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Robins v. WeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Kyle v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API