Kendall v. Foulks
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The complaint in this action is in two counts. For the purposes of this opinion, it is necessary for us to consider only the allegations of the second count. In this count the plaintiff alleges, in effect, that on November 5, 1914, he and the defendant entered into a partnership agreement for the purpose of engaging in the business of carting and hauling. At the time of the creation of the partnership the defendant was purchasing a motor truck under an installment contract. It was agreed that each of the parties should pay the vendor of the truck $50 per month from his own funds, until the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- De Godey v. GodeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Piper v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- White v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hiller v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. Black's Food StoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Union Interchange, Inc. v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Wind v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.