Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 26, 1948No. 6 Div. 773PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to review that part of the opinion of the Court of Appeals wherein it was held that the defendant’s objection to a question propounded to the plaintiff as to the reasonable market value of the car was timely interposed. We will not review other points considered by the Court of Appeals in view of the fact that the petitioner did not argue them in his brief. — Supreme Court Rule 44, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix, as amended March 26, 1947 (248 Ala. VII and VIII).

Generally speaking, where objections to questions propounded to witnesses are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reese v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Bates v. Bank of MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dennis Edward Williams v. Frank Griswald, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Butler v. WaltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. ViseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Mobile Home Brokers, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Walker v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API