Walker v. Ingram
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
Supreme Court Rule 44 as amended, Rules of Practice in Supreme Court, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix (248 Ala. VII), provides in part as follows: “The application for certiorari, or writ of error, must be accompanied by a brief pointing out and arguing the point or decision sought to be revised * * * ”. Under this rule this court treats only those questions considered in the opinion of the Court of Appeals which are treated in brief filed with the application for certiorari. Bradford v. Harris, ante, p. 386, 37 So.2d 677.
Petitioner insists that the Court of Appeals erred in not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Ex parte Birmingham Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Dawsey v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Rhodes v. McWilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Bradford v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. ViseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Helton v. EasterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
- Lancaster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.