Legal Opinion

Reese v. MacKentepe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1932No. 6 Div. 110PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Detinue by L. A. Mackentepe against R. B. Reese for the recovery of certain chattels in specie. There were verdict and judgment for plaintiff. In the complaint the property is described as: One Dodge brothers Victory sedan, serial No. M-42580, motor No. M54-070, one 7-S nontilt Smith mixer, all gear drive power, one 9 H. P. Nove engine. The verdict of the jury was in the following language: “We the jury find for tho plaintiff for the following property sued for, as follows: One Victory Six Sedan Dodge ear, one 7-S non-tilt Smith mixer all gear drive power, and one 9 H. P. Novo engine. And we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. QuintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Hodge v. RamboSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Western Ry. v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. Stewart v. ClemensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Thrasher v. NeeleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Evans v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Bradley v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Nolan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Lusk v. WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API