Crozer Chester Medical Center v. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Health Care Services Review Division
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.*
In this direct appeal, we decide whether the Commonwealth Court should have compelled appellee Department of Labor and Industry (the “Department”) via a writ of mandamus to reach the merits of a fee review petition filed by appellant Crozer Chester Medical Center (“Crozer”) pursuant to Section 306(f.l)(5) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), 77 P.S. § 531(5). The Commonwealth Court declined to issue the writ, concluding that the Department correctly dismissed as premature Crozer’s application for fee review. The issue, as phrased by Crozer, is:
Whether the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Kegerise, S. v. Delgrande, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Armour Pharmacy v. Bureau of WC Fee Review Hearing Office (Wegman's Food Markets, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Selective Insurance Co. of America v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- B. Sinkiewicz and T. Sinkiewicz v. Susquehanna County Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.