Legal Opinion

A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 15, 2016No. 24 MAP 2014PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice DOUGHERTY.

In this appeal by the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) from a grant of mandamus relief, we revisit an issue that evenly divided the Court in Commonwealth v. Gehris, 618 Pa. 104, 54 A.3d 862 (2012), concerning the proper construction of the lifetime-registration triggering language “two or more convictions” in Pennsylvania’s former sex offender registration statute, Megan’s Law II (formerly codified at 42 Pa.C.S. § 9795.1(b)(1) (superseded)).1 In accordance with the Gehris *406Opinion in Support of Reversal (OISR), as supplemented by our analysis below, we hold the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Sykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Snyder Bros., Inc. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. In Re Private Sale of Prop. by the Millcreek Twp. Sch. Dist.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Merscorp, Inc. v. Del. Cnty.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API