Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
Appeal was allowed primarily to address whether, during a termination proceeding, a workers’ compensation judge may correct a notice of compensation payable to subsume injuries not specifically contemplated by the original notice. The question arises because, on the one hand, governing statutory provisions plainly direct that a notice of compensation payable may be corrected at any time and in the context of any petition filed by either of the parties. See 77 P.S. § 771. However, the opinion in Jeanes Hospital v. WCAB (Hass), 582 Pa. 405, 872 A.2d 159 (2005), suggests a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Mayhugh v. CoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Westmoreland County v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- G.V. v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Crozer Chester Medical Center v. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Health Care Services Review DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- S. Sloane v. WCAB (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Harrison v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.