Legal Opinion

Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 2009No. 37 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

Appeal was allowed primarily to address whether, during a termination proceeding, a workers’ compensation judge may correct a notice of compensation payable to subsume injuries not specifically contemplated by the original notice. The question arises because, on the one hand, governing statutory provisions plainly direct that a notice of compensation payable may be corrected at any time and in the context of any petition filed by either of the parties. See 77 P.S. § 771. However, the opinion in Jeanes Hospital v. WCAB (Hass), 582 Pa. 405, 872 A.2d 159 (2005), suggests a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Sell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Mayhugh v. CoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Westmoreland County v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. G.V. v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Crozer Chester Medical Center v. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Health Care Services Review DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. S. Sloane v. WCAB (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Harrison v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API