Legal Opinion

Boland v. Cecil

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1944No. Civ. A. 5688Published

1Opinion of the Court

65 Cal.App.2d Supp. 832 (1944)

R. W. BOLAND, Respondent,

v.

W. J. CECIL, as Director of Agriculture, etc., et al., Appellants.

California Court of Appeals.

July 27, 1944.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, and Eugene M. Elson, Deputy Attorney General, for Appellants.

Lewis D. Collings and Amos Friedman for Respondent.

KINCAID, J. pro tem.

For some three years prior to April 3, 1943, plaintiff lived on and owned real property in El Monte, California, consisting of approximately one-half acre. He kept various kinds of livestock thereon. On April 2, 1943, he slaughtered a cow on said premises. He was not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Louisville & N. R. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1913
  3. In Re GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Merchants Nat. Bk. v. Continental Nat. Bk.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Reed v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API