Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Reed v. Molony

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1940No. Civ. 6329PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment rendered against them pursuant to an order of court sustaining a general and special demurrer to their second complaint without leave to amend the, pleading. By means of replevin the complaint demanded recovery of possession of specific personal property or the value thereof together with alleged loss of possible earnings from a certain formula for the development of moving picture films.

The demurrer was filed by Mr. Molony, one of the members of the board, jointly with Mr. Byrne, the special officer. It was sustained on the ground that the members…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hilton v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. San Francisco Credit Clearing House v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Clement v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Shaw v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wilson v. Loew's Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Coy v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. McPheeters v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API