Legal Opinion

Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 5, 1916No. 136PublishedCited by 70 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the construction of the Safety-Appliance Act and its application to suburban electric Railroads, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

The United States brought this suit against the Railroad Company to recover penalties for fifteen alleged violations of the Safety Appliance Act. The violations consisted in hauling in interstate commerce on October 23,1911, twelve cars which were not provided with hand-holds or grab-irons at the ends, as required by the act, and three cars which were not equipped with automatic couplers. The answer admitted that at the time named all fifteen cars had been used in interstate commerce and that three of them were not equipped with automatic couplers, but denied that the other twelve were not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Chicago ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sunbeam Gold Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API