Legal Opinion
Brunzell Construction Co. v. Barton Developmnet Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1966No. Civ. 22127PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment of dismissal followed, and plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff is a Nevada corporation. It has never been licensed as a contractor in California, but its sole shareholder and responsible managing officer is individually licensed in this state as a general contractor. He is also the sole shareholder and responsible managing officer of Everett S. M. Brunzell Corp., a California corporation which is licensed. On August 10, 1960, plaintiff corporation and defendant entered into a written contract, under which plaintiff was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Citizens State Bank v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Weiman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Vallejo Development Co. v. Beck Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Welsch v. GoswickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Executive Landscape Corp. v. San Vicente Country Villas IV Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Housing Development Co. v. HoschlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.