Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Glendale

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1936No. Civ. 9845PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in defendants’ favor after an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint.

The action is one for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of defendant city in maintaining a public sidewalk in a dangerous and defective condition. W. J. MacIntyre and F. W. Curl were joined as defendants in their alleged capacity as “officers of said city”. Plaintiff did not present her claim for damages to defendant city within ninety days after the accident, as required by chapter 1167, Statutes…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API