Legal Opinion

Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. Gillum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 31, 1989No. 66830PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.

The issues presented for review are: 1) May proof of a changed condition be effectively dispensed with by an employer’s in-court stipulation never sought to be withdrawn with leave of the trial tribunal? and 2) Did the worker meet his burden to establish that the heart transplant he seeks should be approved as a “reasonable and necessary” expense incident to recovery from a compensable accidental injury? We answer the first question in the affirmative and the second in the negative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

On August 20, 1982 and May 22, 1983 Wilton Ray Gillum…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Smith v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Woodrow v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Ferguson v. Ferguson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Bedford-Carthage Stone Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LivsheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API