Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Swart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1985No. 59675PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The dispositive question is whether an initial waiver of trial by jury, and of the right to transfer a cause from the small claims docket to the regular docket of the district court, remains binding after the judgment is reversed on appeal and remanded for a new trial.

Edward A. Seymour, appellee, and Kelli Ann Swart, appellant, were involved in an automobile collision in which each of their cars received minor damage. Seymour, appearing pro se, filed suit in small claims division of the district court to recover $348.90 for damages sustained to his vehicle. Swart…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API