Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Ferguson Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 6, 1988No. 70493PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The questions presented are: 1) Did the Workers’ Compensation Court have jurisdiction to vacate the award in suit after the time to seek appellate review had expired? If not, 2) Can the alleged error in the award under consideration be corrected by a nunc pro tunc order of the Workers’ Compensation Court? We answer both questions in the negative.
On November 18,1986 compensation was awarded Anna Mae Ferguson [claimant] for the death of her husband, Donald Ray Ferguson [decedent]. The award, which was made against Ferguson Motor Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Salyer v. National Trailer Convoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Woodrow v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.