Legal Opinion
Peoples State Bank v. Penello
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1924No. Civ. No. 2695 Civ. No. 2696PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, J., pro tem.
These two actions were consolidated and tried together before the same jury. Judgments were rendered in favor of plaintiff on directed verdicts, and from these judgments the defendants appeal. The actions have been twice tried, and this is the second time that they are before this court. The first trial resulted in verdicts and judgments in favor of defendants, and upon appeals, prosecuted by plaintiff, the judgments were reversed. (See Peoples State Bank v. Penello, 59 Cal. App. 174 [210 Pac. 432].) The actions were commenced on April 22, 1921, and they were first tried in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Eames v. CrosierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Peoples State Bank v. PenelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Blochman Commercial & Savings Bank v. MorettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berger v. SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Colley v. Chowchilla National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930