Blochman Commercial & Savings Bank v. Moretti
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This is'an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action upon a promissory note executed by the defendants and transferred to the plaintiff’s assignor before maturity. The answer of the defendants admitted the execution of the note, but proceeded to set forth that in the making and delivery thereof to the persons by whom it was transferred to the assignor of plaintiff they were misled by certain false and fraudulent misrepresentations as to the present and prospective value of the stock of a certain corporation known as The Western Underwriting and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Henry v. SneedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Commercial Bank v. BurgwynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spence v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Goodale v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Security-First National Bank v. J. G. Ruddle Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Peoples State Bank v. PenelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.