Legal Opinion

Colley v. Chowchilla National Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1927No. Docket No. Sac. 3772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

By a stipulation of the parties the above-entitled causes were heard together in the court below, and while separate judgments were entered in each case and separate notices of appeal filed, still a consolidated record on appeal was prepared and the causes have been carried on our calendar under one number. They will, therefore, be considered and disposed of as one case.

This is appropriate, for the same basic questions underlie them and a determination thereof will guide our action in both causes. They will be known herein as cause one and cause two, respectively, following the order…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. McCormick v. Market BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Ehrenreich v. SheltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Amsterdam Lumber, Inc. v. DyksterhouseMontana Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API