Legal Opinion

Peoples State Bank v. Penello

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1922No. Civ. No. 2454PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

By stipulation these two actions were consolidated and tried together before the same jury. The complaints were filed the same day, each seeking to recover from the defendant the aggregate amount of one thousand dollars upon three promissory notes, the circumstances in both cases being identical. The notes were originally given to the Hunt-Jewett-Bontz Co., a corporation, of Turlock, for one thousand dollars’ worth of stock in said corporation to be issued to each defendant. After execution said notes were assigned before maturity, along with other notes of the Hunt-Jewett-Bontz Co., to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Eames v. CrosierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Sonoma Valley Bank v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Robinson v. HurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Barthelmess v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Parkinson v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Williams v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API