Legal Opinion

Tarlow v. Arntson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1973PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs seek interpretation of a written agreement concerning the common use by plaintiffs and defendants of an elevator and also supplementary relief in the form of an injunction restraining defendants’ use of the elevator. Plaintiffs appeal from a decree of the trial court declaring that defendants are entitled to the use of the elevator in common with plaintiffs as long as defendants’ use does not unreasonably interfere with plaintiffs’ use and as long as defendants pay their proportionate share of the costs of maintenance and repair of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Strandholm v. BarbeyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Rouse v. ROY L. HOUCK SONS'CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Chick v. TomlinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Busto v. MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Apeldyn Corp. v. Eidos, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API