Legal Opinion

Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1994No. 89-2198 CV; CA A72816PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*513DURHAM, J. pro tempore

Defendants appeal a jury verdict entered against them for $2,552,566. They make multiple assignments of error. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed three claims against defendant Weyerhaeuser Company (Weyerhaeuser): malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress and defamation. The jury found for plaintiff and awarded $900,000 noneconomic damages, $2,566 economic damages and $1,500,000 punitive damages against Weyerhaeuser on those claims. The jury found defendant Hoff hahle on plaintiffs claims of intentional infliction of severe emotional distress and…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Pulliam v. Coastal Emergency Services of Richmond, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  4. House v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Sharp Ex Rel. Gordon v. Case Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API