Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*513DURHAM, J. pro tempore
Defendants appeal a jury verdict entered against them for $2,552,566. They make multiple assignments of error. We affirm.
Plaintiff filed three claims against defendant Weyerhaeuser Company (Weyerhaeuser): malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress and defamation. The jury found for plaintiff and awarded $900,000 noneconomic damages, $2,566 economic damages and $1,500,000 punitive damages against Weyerhaeuser on those claims. The jury found defendant Hoff hahle on plaintiffs claims of intentional infliction of severe emotional distress and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Pulliam v. Coastal Emergency Services of Richmond, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- House v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Sharp Ex Rel. Gordon v. Case Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.