Legal Opinion

Rouse v. ROY L. HOUCK SONS'CORPORATION

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiffs, claiming to be the assignees of a license to quarry and remove rock, appeal a judgment denying recovery in an action for damages for “conversion” ① against a construction company which quarried and removed rock under a subsequent license from the landowner.

The assignment of error challenges the granting of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict after a jury had awarded the plaintiffs general and punitive damages against Roy L. Houck Sons’ Corporation.

The controversy grew out of an instrument apparently prepared by the plaintiffs’ assignors and captioned “option contract.” The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strandholm v. BarbeyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. ANDERSON ET UX. v. MoothartOregon Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Eliopulos v. Kondo Farms, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Tarlow v. ArntsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rose v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API