Legal Opinion
Apeldyn Corp. v. Eidos, LLC
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 8, 2013No. Case No. 3:12-cv-00722-SIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SIMON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Apeldyn Corporation has sued Defendant Eidos, LLC, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief relating to the enforceability of the 2008 Patent Agreement (“Patent Agreement”) entered into between the parties and alleging breach of contract relating to a separate agreement between the parties. Dkt. 3. Eidos counterclaimed for breach of the Patent Agreement and for fraud; Eidos also seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and the appointment of a receiver. Dkt. 12. Apeldyn has moved for partial summary judgment, seeking a declaration that: (1) the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Botez v. Northstar CG, LPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc. v. Oregon Worsted CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Gee Automotive Portland I, LLC v. ECT BETT Investments TGH LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- McKenzie Law Firm, P.A. v. Ruby Receptionists, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- McKenzie Law Firm, P.A. v. Ruby Receptionists, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.