Legal Opinion
Yogman v. Parrott
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 30, 1997No. CC 94-4377; CA A89262; SC S43641PublishedCited by 291 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
Plaintiffs and defendants own houses in a beachfront subdivision in Lincoln County. Plaintiffs’ and defendants’ lots are subject to a set of restrictive covenants, among them the following:
“All lots within said tract shall be used exclusively for residential purposes and no commercial enterprise shall be constructed or permitted on any of said property.”
Defendants use their beach house as a vacation home and, when they are not using it themselves, they rent it for short periods of time to others, who likewise use it as a vacation home.
Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking (a) a declaration…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Crawford v. SenoskyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by291 opinions
- Jeff Boardman v. Pacific Seafood GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Eden Gate, Inc. v. D&L Excavating & Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Williams v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Zygar v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.