Dinsmore's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.
The decision of the Industrial Accident Commission, underlying the decree of the Superior Court to which the present appeal relates, serves to emphasize the proper tendency of those charged with the duty of administering The Workmen’s Compensation Act, It. S. 1944, Chap. 26, as amended, referred to hereafter as the “Act,” to carry *345the protection of employees coming within its provisions to the permissible limits of the controls established by it. Those controls, construed by this court in so many decisions that there is no point in citing any of them, restricted compensation under the Act,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Industrial Commission v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Rogers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roberts v. American Chain & Cable Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- McKinney v. Hardwick Clothes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Oliver v. Wyandotte Industries CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Babine v. Lane Construction CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Tromba v. Harwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.