Legal Opinion

Rogers's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 1, 1945PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The crucial findings of subsidiary facts upon which this case must be decided are these. The employee worked in a hat factory. He was accustomed to come to work in an automobile of a fellow employee which would be parked in a "parking lot” owned and “furnished” by the employer where the employer permitted its employees to park. At the time of the injury the automobile was parked as usual in the "parking lot.” The employee left it to go to. work, and while still on the lot and “going down an incline.” he lull and broke an ankle. "It was no part of the duty of the employee to use an automobile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Souza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Bresnahan v. BarreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Murphy v. MiettinenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Latter's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Nagle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Charon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Proctor-Silex Corp. v. DeBrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. United States Casualty Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API